Legal Opinion
Frontier Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 26, 2006No. 04-1343, 04-1344, 04-1349PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Before us are petitions for review of orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requiring certain crude oil carriers to pay shippers reparations for excessive rates. The carrier-petitioners contend that FERC went too far, in holding that a joint rate exceeds the just and reasonable rate simply on the basis of a finding about the costs for providing service on one of four segments, where the Commission has denied the carrier any opportunity to show that the overall rate did not exceed costs.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Exxonmobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Western Refining Company, L.P., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Markwest Michigan Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- SFPP LP v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Western Refining Southwest, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Mobil Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.