Legal Opinion

Heid v. CyraCom International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 30, 2024No. 3:22-cv-01445Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HELAINE HEID, INGRID LEEMAN, Case No. 22-cv-1445-MMA (KSC) and MIRIAM SARAIVA, individually 12 and on behalf of themselves and all others ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 similarly situated, FINAL APPROVAL OF FLSA COLLECTIVE AND CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT, 15 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, NAMED PLAINTIFFS’ SERVICE 16 CYRACOM INT’L, INC, et al., AWARD, AND ADMINISTRATION 17 Defendants. COSTS 18 [Doc. No. 36] 19 20 21 Helaine Heid, Ingrid Leeman, and Miriam Saraiva (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring 22…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API