Legal Opinion

Rosee v. Board of Trade

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 24, 1964No. 63 C 1348PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILL, District Judge.

Roger E. Harper, an employee of the Commodity Exchange Authority, has moved to quash a deposition subpoena *514and a subpoena duces tecum served on him by plaintiff Rosee. In support of his motion, Harper states that he informed his superior, the Secretary of Agriculture, of the documents sought by subpoena and that the Secretary, pursuant to regulations adopted by him, has determined that the majority of the documents sought are restricted from disclosure and that officials of the Department of Agriculture are prohibited by law from producing them.

Two questions are presented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Capitol Fish CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freeman v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Jessee E. Swanner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Rosee v. Board of TradeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
  4. Christy v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1975
  5. McFadden v. Avco CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API