Legal Opinion

Molinari v. Molinari

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert F. Doran, J.

In this matrimonial action, the first affirmative defense is that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The plaintiff has moved to strike the affirmative defense.

Defendant opposed the motion citing the decision of the Appellate Division, First Department, in Riland v Todman & Co. (56 AD2d 350). The court has tested that decision and found there is conflict between the Appellate Division, First Department, and Appellate Division, Second Department.

The Appellate Division, Second Department, holds that the defense that a claim fails to state a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riland v. Frederick S. Todman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Bazinet v. LorenzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Konow v. SugarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Wheeler v. Stevensville Hotel & Country ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Di Prospero v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. McMurtyNew York Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API