Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ohio Ex Rel. Seney v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 13, 1922No. 67PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Styling himself the plaintiff, and declaring that he proceeded officially on behalf of the State, Allen J. Seney, prosecuting attorney, instituted the original proceeding.' against Swift & Company and The Northern Refrigerating Company, in the Court of Common Pleas for Lucas County, Ohio. He charged that those companies were parties to certain agreements and transactions in respect of stored pork products denounced by the Valentine AntiTrust Law and the Smith Cold Storage Law, and prayed for an order restraining delivery of the products to Swift & Company, for a receiver, and for an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Loeb v. Columbia Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Union & Planters' Bank v. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. House v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Eure v. NVF Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1979
  3. State Tax Commission v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1974
  4. Flanigan v. Security-First Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  5. New Orleans Public Belt R. Commission for City of New Orleans v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API