Legal Opinion
State v. Rosales
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1994No. A-93-774PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin, Judge.
Rudy Arthur Rosales was convicted in the district court for Lancaster County of theft by unlawful taking, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-511 (Reissue 1989). The property taken had a value of $9,678. At an enhancement hearing, Rosales was found to be a habitual criminal as defined in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2221 (Reissue 1989) and was sentenced to 15 to 20 years’ imprisonment. Rosales has appealed to this court, claiming, among other things, that his court-appointed standby counsel was ineffective and that Rosales was denied adequate access to a law library and other tools…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Douglas County v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Jennings v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DavisNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. WilsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.