Legal Opinion

Chippewa County State Bank v. Kief

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 21, 1927No. 26,185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order denying a new trial after findings in favor of defendant.

The suit is upon a promissory note executed by defendant to the Chippewa County State Bank, now in the hands of the state superintendent of banks for liquidation. The defenses were (a) want of consideration, and (b) that the note was obtained by means of fraud and deception practiced on defendant by means of false and fraudulent representations and concealment by the payee. The court found both defenses true, and allowed a counterclaim in the amount of $455, being the balance to his credit in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Dunn v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Kraus v. National Bank of Commerce of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Old Colony Life Insurance v. MoegleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lack Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Chippewa County State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel v. KiefSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Sullivan v. State Bank of MortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Lack Industries, Incorporated v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API