Chippewa County State Bank v. Kief
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order denying a new trial after findings in favor of defendant.
The suit is upon a promissory note executed by defendant to the Chippewa County State Bank, now in the hands of the state superintendent of banks for liquidation. The defenses were (a) want of consideration, and (b) that the note was obtained by means of fraud and deception practiced on defendant by means of false and fraudulent representations and concealment by the payee. The court found both defenses true, and allowed a counterclaim in the amount of $455, being the balance to his credit in his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Dunn v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Kraus v. National Bank of Commerce of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Old Colony Life Insurance v. MoegleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lack Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Chippewa County State Bank Ex Rel. Veigel v. KiefSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Sullivan v. State Bank of MortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Lack Industries, Incorporated v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964