Legal Opinion

Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Authority

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1987No. 85-5915Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

479 U.S. 418 (1987)

WRIGHT ET AL.

v.

CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY

No. 85-5915.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 6, 1986

Decided January 14, 1987

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Henry L. Woodward argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Renae Reed Patrick.

Bayard E. Harris argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White

Petitioners in this case, tenants living in low-income housing projects owned by respondent, brought suit under 42 U. S. C. § 1983,[1] alleging that respondent overbilled them for their…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API