Legal Opinion

Rennie v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1923No. 12161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, O.

The plaintiff commenced its action against the defendant for recovery on certain promissory notes therein described. The defendant admitted the execution of the notes sued on. By way of affirmative defenses the defendant alleged: (a) That the notes were given as part payment for a threshing machine and were secured by a chattel mortgage on the machinery; (b) that the plaintiff accepted the machinery from the defendant in settlement of the notes sued on; (b) that the plaintiff foreclosed and unlawfully sold the property and thereby became a conversioner. In a trial of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Congdon v. McAlester Carriage & Wagon FactorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Lynde-Bowman-Darby Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cowen v. T. J. Stewart Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Young v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Persson v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API