Legal Opinion

United States v. Heinrich

District Court, D. Montana

Decided February 25, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

This is an action at law on the part of the government to collect, from the defendant, construction costs of irrigation works supplying water to his lands, as a personal charge against the defendant as owner of such lands. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground tjiat it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which is the question for consideration. This action, according to counsel for the government, is based largely upon the Act of Congress of June 4, 1920 (41 Stat. 751), and especially upon section 8 thereof. Under this act all…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Packer v. BirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darr v. Mutual Life Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  2. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation v. Klies Livestock Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1958
  3. United States v. PowersDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API