Legal Opinion
Richland Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Pierce
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1982No. 81-1282PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs brought this suit to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) from providing federal financial assistance for the construction and operation of a certain low-income apartment project in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiffs alleged that, in approving federal financing for the apartment project, HUD violated procedures mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq., and by administrative law. The plaintiffs are associations of residential property…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Strycker's Bay Neighborhood Council, Inc. v. KarlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Assn. of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re: Avantel, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents and Associates, Inc. v. Colonel Lloyd Kent BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. HurstDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
- Richland Park Homeowners Association, Inc. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Northfork Citizens for Responsible Development v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.