Legal Opinion

Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Board of Sup'rs

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1910No. 3,099PublishedCited by 23 opinions

In Error to the.Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern. District of -Iowa. Proceedings before the Board of Supervisors of Appanoose County, Iowa, to establish a drainage ditch. From an award of damages by-appraisers to the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company that company appealed and removed the cause into the federal court. From the judgment of that court (170 Fed. 665), it brings error.

Read the full summary

In Error to the.Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern. District of -Iowa. Proceedings before the Board of Supervisors of Appanoose County, Iowa, to establish a drainage ditch. From an award of damages by-appraisers to the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company that company appealed and removed the cause into the federal court. From the judgment of that court (170 Fed. 665), it brings error. On the 4th day of June, 1904, the owners of land situated in the Chariton Valley, Iowa, filed a petition with the defendant, board of supervisors, praying the establishment and…

1Opinion of the CourtAmidon, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). An important question of fact at the trial was whether the drain followed a water course at its point of intersection with plaintiff’s roads. There are two creeks arising in the eastern bluffs bordering on the valley, and flowing southwesterly, and finally discharging into Chariton river. Both streams have well-defined channels at their upper course, and also in portions of the valley, but at other points' their banks disappear and they become lakes or bayous. The northermost stream, known as “L,ooust Creek,” enters the valley north of the north line of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Rockwall County Levee Improvement District No. 3Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. North American Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Webster County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API