Legal Opinion

Goldston v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1989No. 87-591Published

1Opinion of the Court

562 A.2d 96 (1989)

Jamie E. GOLDSTON, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 87-591.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Submitted July 12, 1988.

Decided July 6, 1989.

Jensen E. Barber, Washington, D.C., appointed by this court, was on the brief, for appellant.

Timothy J. Reardon, III, Principal Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, Elizabeth Trosman, Eva Polin, and Patricia A. Riley, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before NEWMAN and BELSON, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.

GALLAGHER,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API