Legal Opinion

People v. Dianda

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1987PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On May 24, 1984, State Trooper Charles Jones was working as an undercover narcotics investigator, when he met defendant at Arthur’s Court, a tavern in the City of Hudson. The two played pool together and drank beer. At one point, they decided to go up to the bar to buy another drink, where Jones remarked to defendant that the beer was "so small you probably should have some cocaine for the beer”. What transpired thereafter was the subject of conflicting testimony at trial. Jones testified that defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. FeldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. KitchingNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. MattiaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. DeasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API