James Brown v. Ronald Marshall, Supt.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by petitioner James Brown from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by Judge John Manos. The instant review presents the issues of improper prosecutorial comment and double jeopardy which were addressed by the district court, and an additional basis for relief, a purportedly erroneous jury instruction, which Brown here attempts to present for the first time in any forum. We affirm the district court on both matters considered below and, distinguishing the situation sub judice from that of a “mixed” petition proscribed by Rose v. Lundy,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc., a California Corporation Harold D. Goldstein and Michael Bradley KrivacekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Robert C. Bannert v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by40 opinions
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Douglas Coley v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Russ' Kwik Car Wash, Inc. Clean Cars, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Company Gastown, Inc. Emro Marketing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Vasquez v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- William Chandler v. Otie Jones and Attorney General of the State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.