Legal Opinion
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc., a California Corporation Harold D. Goldstein and Michael Bradley Krivacek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1982No. 80-5370PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc., and individual appellants, Harold Goldstein and Michael Krivacek,1 (Co Petro) appeal from an *576order of the district court, 502 F.Supp. 806, permanently enjoining them from offering, selling, or otherwise engaging in futures contracts in petroleum products, in violation of §§ 4 and 4h of the Commodity Exchange A.ct, as amended, (the Act), 7 U.S.C. §§ 6, 6h (1976). Co Petro contends that the contracts it sold were not subject to the Act. Co Petro also appeals from the district court’s award of relief ancillary to the permanent injunction. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Federal Trade Commission v. Gem Merchandising Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Marilyn Kay Fernandez, Etc., Banco Nacional De Cuba, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees, Gilbert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.