Legal Opinion
Wright v. Hills
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 9, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 88-0342PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. The main issue in this case is whether a party can avoid summary judgment by filing an affidavit which contradicts his previous depositional testimony. A secondary issue is whether the trial court erred in imposing sanctions under Rule 11(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., against the appellant and his attorneys.
FACTS
Jack Wright filed a complaint against the defendants which alleged that one John C. Trevizo asked him to find investors to forestall a pending foreclosure on a parcel of land located in Mesa,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shelcusky v. GarjulioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- James, Cooke & Hobson, Inc. v. Lake Havasu Plumbing & Fire ProtectionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Callender v. Transpacific Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Allstate Indemnity Co. v. RidgelyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.