Legal Opinion
Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided September 21, 1977No. Civ. A. B-74-392-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JOE J. FISHER, Chief Judge.
The above-styled and numbered cause came on for trial by the Court and the Court having considered the pleadings, the evidence adduced at the trial and in depositions and documents, the arguments of counsel and stipulations of counsel, and the briefs filed by the respective parties, and having been fully advised, makes and files its findings of fact and conclusions of law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. NATURE OF THE SUIT AND JURISDICTION
1. This is a patent infringement suit brought by plaintiff, Studiengesellschaft Kohle, mbH, a German…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Katz v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.