Legal Opinion · Dissent
Matter of Soto (Goldman)
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1960Published
1DissentFroessel, J.
Seven employees (herein called petitioners), each earning about $42 per week, were threatened with discharge by their employer, Lenscraft Optical Corporation, for having allegedly caused slowdown activities at the latter’s plant. At the instance of appellant, petitioners’ union Local No. 122, which had a collective bargaining agreement with the employer, the provisions of which are not before us, arbitration was had with the employer and the matter was submitted to the New York State Board of Mediation.
About two hours before the arbitration hearing was scheduled, the employer delivered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Pattenge v. Wagner Iron WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Iroquois Beverage Corp. v. International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1955