Legal Opinion

Natkin Service Company v. Joe Winiarz

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided June 29, 2000No. 03-99-00122-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-99-00122-CV

Natkin Service Company, Appellant

v.

Joe Winiarz, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 96-04511, HONORABLE JOSEPH H. HART, JUDGE PRESIDING

DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully dissent.

The law does not favor default judgments and, as the majority notes, the usual rule that all presumptions are made in support of a judgment does not apply when reviewing the sufficiency of service preceding a default judgment. See Wilson v. Dunn, 800 S.W.2d 833, 836 (Tex. 1990) (quoting Uvalde Country Club v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Wallace, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  4. Pharmakinetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  5. Verlander Enterprises, Inc. v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API