Legal Opinion

Platte Sand & Gravel Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1931No. 27888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This appeal is from an order entered by the state railway commission, directing defendant to refund to plaintiff certain alleged overcharges for freight on 22 car lots of gravel, shipped by plaintiff from its gravel pit in Saunders county to DeBolt Place in Douglas county, over defendant’s line of railway to Omaha and thence over the Chicago & Northwestern railway to DeBolt Place. Defendant appeals.

The rate exacted by defendant was 5i/2 cents per cwt. Defendant contends that this rate was lawfully established by the railway commission as a joint-haul rate for gravel over the two lines of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. McCaffrey Bros. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. v. Georgia R. R. CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1914
  4. Knight v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Knight v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United Mineral Products Co. v. Nebraska Railroads of Western Trunk Lines CommitteeNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API