Legal Opinion
Anthony v. Bitler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 22, 1996No. 95 C 3820PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is the Motion to Enforce Subpoena Duces Tecum of Plaintiff Mark Anthony. Anthony is attempting to subpoena documents from a law firm and use the documents in his civil case in the Southern District of New York, Anthony v. Bitler, No. 93 6917. The law firm, McBride, Baker & Coles (“MBC”), contends that it need not honor the subpoena because it has an attorney retention lien over the documents. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
As a preliminary matter, although not disputed, the court marks that it has jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pomerantz v. SchandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In the Matter of Richard C. Browy, Bankrupts. James S. Brannon, as Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Stephen D. Gay, AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Lucky-Goldstar International (America), Inc. v. International Manufacturing Sales Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Jernryd v. NilssonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Tri-Ex Enterprises, Inc. v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paula Johnson v. Leland Cherry and James Mister, Appeal Of: Barbara J. CliniteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Alessi Family Ltd. Partnership v. Centurion Development, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Clinite, Barbara J. v. Cherry, LelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Twin Sewer and Water, Inc. v. Midwest Bank and Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999