Legal Opinion

Cox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1917No. 4355Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

March 28, 1917.

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

In a motion for rehearing appellant urges error in the opinion heretofore affirming the judgment. We deem it unnecessary to restate the question urged in the motion. Appellant’s general reputation for character was placed in issue. The State was permitted to show that he had been charged with perjury, and twice convicted in the same case. When appellant, in reply to queries, stated that he had been charged but acquitted of perjury, the matter should have stopped, and appellant’s objection to further inquiry should have been sustained.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Darnell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Crowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Clements v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Jennings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Baldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API