Legal Opinion
Tos v. Jackson Heights Care Center, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint (see Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122-123 [1999]). A court may strike a pleading as a sanction if a party “refuses to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully fails to disclose information which the court finds ought to have been disclosed” (CPLR 3126; see Moray v City of Yonkers, 76 AD3d 618 [2010]; Mazza v Seneca, 72 AD3d 754 [2010]; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654 [2010]). The willful and contumacious character of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Pirro Group, LLC v. One Point Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Dank v. Sears Holding Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Workman v. Town of SouthamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Mazza v. SenecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by13 opinions
- Palmieri v. Piano Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Wolf v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Poveromo v. Kelley-Amerit Fleet Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- New York Timber, LLC v. Seneca CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Pesce v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.