Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Weigand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 3, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a probationary correction officer after he was arrested for driving while intoxicated. The employer appeals the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant’s behavior did not amount to disqualifying misconduct. We affirm. Unlike Matter of Cerasuolo (New York City Dept. of Correction — Hudacs)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re the Claim of CerasuoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Silberzweig v. DohertyNew York Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API