United States v. Jose Araujo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Jose Araujo, Rafael Hichez, a/k/a “Neno”, and Jorgita Rivera appeal from judgments of conviction entered in the Southern District of New York after a jury trial before Judge Cooper. Their principal claims of error are that the admission of evidence pertaining to prior criminal activities in which they were not involved deprived them of a fair trial, that certain comments made by the prosecutor and the court were prejudicial, and that the trial judge employed improper criteria in passing sentence. Finding these contentions to be without merit, we…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- United States v. Wilson Arroyo-Angulo, Hugo Gomez, Jaime Rayo-Montano and Guillermo MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Peter Angelilli, William Butler, Donald Irish, and Donald RibotskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.