Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of spangles slung, similar to those involved in Fashion Trimming Cory. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 462), the claim at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1503 was sustained, holding the merchandise in ques*295tion dutiable as “articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, not embroidered, tamboured, appliqued, or scalloped, composed wholly or in chief value of spangles.”
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fashion Trimming Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941