Legal Opinion
Maryland Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service Commission
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 15, 2015No. 2173/14PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraeff, J.
This case arises from an order issued by the Maryland Public Service Commission (the “Commission” or the “PSC”), one of the appellees. The order authorized Potomac Electric Power Company (“Pepeo” or the “Company”), another appel-lee, to: (1) increase its rates for the distribution of electricity by $27,883,000; and (2) impose a Grid Resiliency Charge (“GRC”) to contemporaneously recover costs associated with the Advanced Priority Feeders Project.1
Appellants, AARP Maryland (“AARP”) and the Maryland Office of the People’s Counsel (“OPC”) filed separate petitions for judicial review in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Department of Health and Mental Hygiene v. ShrievesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maryland Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Matter of Md. Off. of People's CounselCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Matter of Md. Off. of People's CounselCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- NRG Energy v. Public Service Comm'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021