Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Ed Burnett

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1985No. 84-1453PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

Harold Ed Burnett was convicted of first degree murder in the Northern District of Oklahoma. On appeal he asserts six grounds.

First, Burnett argues that the United States District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The issue turns on whether the site of the killing is in “Indian country” subject to federal jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 1153 (1982). If it is not Indian country, the state of Oklahoma has exclusive jurisdiction.

The murder victim was Laban Marchmont Miles, a half-blood Osage Indian who was shot to death in his home on April 15, 1982. Miles resided…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. PelicanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. United States v. NiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. United States v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. WatchmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Steve A. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. David James BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API