Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Danelson (In Re Danelson)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana

Decided July 23, 1992No. 19-60076PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN L. PETERSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This adversary proceeding is a removed action from Montana State District Court wherein the Plaintiff Carol Mitchell, an attorney, filed a pre-petition complaint against the Debtor/Defendant to collect on a promissory note in the sum of $10,387.71. The Debtor’s answer admits the execution of the note, but resists payment on grounds the note was given under duress and constituted fraud. The Debtor further filed a compulsory counterclaim against the Plaintiff alleging professional negligence by the Plaintiff when representing the Debtor in the divorce…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In the Matter of Gerald J. Ross, Also Known as Jerry Ross, Bankrupt. Gerald J. RossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durkin v. Shea & GouldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Bero-Wachs v. Law Office of Logar & PulverNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ronald L. Durkin, Trustee of the Benchmark Irrevocable Trust v. Shea & Gould Sheldon Camhy, Ronald L. Durkin v. Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & LerachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API