Legal Opinion
Bell v. Ralston Purina Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1958No. 5808PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the plaintiff on behalf of herself, and also as executrix of her husband’s estate, to recover total and permanent disability payments based on allegations that the defendant Ralston Purina Company had entered into a contract with her husband, an employee of Ralston, to make these payments. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company was made a defendant because it carried group insurance on Ralston’s employees. It was alleged that Metropolitan acquiesced in the contract. The trial court found that the evidence did not sustain the existence of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Natl. Surety Co. v. Board of Educ. of City of HugoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Doyle-Kidd Dry Goods Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Barnes v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Kansas, Okla. & Gulf Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kapp v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Bell v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Creative Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Creative Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Joseph R. Kapp v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Joseph R. Kapp v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Joseph R. Kapp v. National Football League, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.