Legal Opinion

Doyle-Kidd Dry Goods Co. v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1925No. 15504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiff in error was the defendant- below, and the defendant in error was the plaintiff. The parties will be designated herein as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff brought his action against the defendant in the district court of Muskogee county for damages alleged to have been sustained by him by reason of the alleged breach of a contract. He alleges in his petition:

"That in the year 1921, the! defendant agreed, for a valuable consideration to purchase a stock of goods and accounts formerly owned by the Ingram Trading…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shuttee v. Coalgate Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. King Collie Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bell v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. Doyle-Kidd D. G. Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Eason Oil Co. v. M. A. Swatek & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API