Commonwealth v. Parsons
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
OLSON, J.:
Timothy Allen Parsons (“Parsons”) purports to appeal pro se from the order, entered on June 20, 2016, which modified the conditions of his bail by requiring him to complete a Court Reporting Network (“CRN”) evaluation. 1 We hold that Parsons’ challenge is, in part, properly construed as a petition for review pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1762(b)(2), which permits appellate review of bail orders pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. Pursuant to our authority to review bail orders under Rule 1762(b)(2), we hold that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. Taylor, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Com. v. Talley, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Carter, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Carter, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Talley, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Bomar-Sweet, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.