Legal Opinion
Harris v. Richards Manufacturing Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 31, 1981No. C-77-2700PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HORTON, District Judge.
After hearing and reviewing all of the evidence and considering the arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in this ease:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The defendant Richards Manufacturing Company [Richards] is a subsidiary of William Rorer, Inc., and employs approximately 775 employees in its plant in Memphis, Tennessee.
2. The plaintiff Clara M. Harris began work at Richards on November 18, 1968, as a packager in softgoods. At the time of her discharge, February 15,1977, only one other black…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. SweeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dr. Joy HOCHSTADT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Susan McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Collins v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Estate of Harris v. Papa John's PizzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Clara M. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARDS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Nelson v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.