In Re Estate of Loheide
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Humboldt County settling the final and supplemental accounts of an administrator. George D. Murray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Denver Sevier, C. P. Cutten, and Thomas, Frick & Beedy, for Appellant. Thomas, Grestle, Frick & Beedy, and Charles P. Cutten, for United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Surety for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an appeal by W. L. Loheide, administrator of the estate of William H. Loheide, deceased, from an order and decree of settlement of his final and supplemental accounts. . In his final account he charged himself with a large number of items commencing October 26, 1907: “To cash on hand in Humboldt County Bank, $695.09,” and to various sums of money received from various sources to January 18, 1909, amounting in all to $14,120.30. To this he adds the following:
“1907, cash on hand in Hibernia Savings & Loan
S’y S. F..................................$2164.94
“Dec. 31/07 Cash interest, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of Torrey v. TorreyArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Smith's Estate, Davies v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1941
- Barth v. PlattArizona Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.