Legal Opinion
Hood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1945No. A-10398PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, P. J.
Defendants, Booker T. Hood and Helen Butler, were charged by information in the district court of Craig county with the crime of conjoint robbery; were tried, convicted and each sentenced to serve a term of five years in the State Penitentiary, and have appealed.
The following assignments of error are presented by defendants:
“1. Irregularity in the proceedings of the court, jury and county attorney and abuse of discretion by which the plaintiffs in error were prevented from having a fair trial.
“2. That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law.
“3. The failure…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Sears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- People v. BorraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Key v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Wininegar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Lay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.