Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 14, 1937No. A-9125PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.
When this case was called for trial, tbe county attorney read a copy of tbe original information filed in this case to tbe jury, and after reading tbe same, made bis opening statement. It afterwards developed that tbe information wbicb be read was not tbe “amended information” wbicb bad been filed and on wbicb tbe defendant was being prosecuted, and was not tbe information that bad been served on tbe defendant and to wbicb be bad plead on being arraigned. After some preliminary statements by counsel and tbe court, tbe “amended information” was found in one of tbe drawers of a table in tbe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Horn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Perry v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
- Mitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
- McLeod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.