Legal Opinion

Wang v. Wang

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1989No. 16295, 16299PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERKEN, Circuit Judge.

This is the third appeal arising out of the transactions that gave birth to Wang v. Wang, 393 N,W.2d 771 (S.D.1986) (Wang I) and Wang v. Wang, 440 N.W.2d 740 (S.D.1989) (Wang II). Robert Wang (Robert) and Victor Wang (Victor) have separately appealed from the same summary judgment. We affirm.

On January 18, 1978, Victor executed a promissory note to the Rosebud Federal Credit Union (RFCU) due and payable on January 19, 1979. The note was secured by financing agreements on various items of Victor’s property. At this time RFCU and its affiliate Farmer’s Cooperative Oil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Ruple v. WeinaugSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ruane v. MurraySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Clauson v. KempfferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands v. WynneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wang v. Farmers State Bank of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. South Dakota Board of Nursing v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API