Legal Opinion
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 23, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-0968-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Chief Judge.
This case is before me on the defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The parties have briefed the issues contained in those motions and the Court has heard oral argument. The motions are, therefore, ripe for disposition. For the reasons stated below, I will grant the defendants’ motions on the ground that Paul French’s testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
FACTS:
This action arises under the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 & 26, and portions of the Virginia and West Virginia Code. The plaintiff, Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc., represents a class of wholesale…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Roberts v. City of TroyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Supermarket Of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Aluminum Phosphide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- State of Mich. Ex Rel. Kelley v. McDonald Dairy Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- Supermarket of Marl v. Valley Rich DairyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998