Legal Opinion
Novo v. Danbury
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 12, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00907Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KELLY NOVO, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-907 (VAB) CITY OF DANBURY, DAVID PARDOVICH, CHRISTOPHER RINK, ERIC CIEPLY, & PATRICK RIDENHOUR, Defendants. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND AMEND Kelly Novo (“Plaintiff”) has sued David Pardovich, Christopher Rink, and Eric Cieply, officers of the Danbury Police Department, as well as Patrick Ridenhour, the Chief of Police, and the City of Danbury (“Danbury,” and together, “Defendants”) for negligence, recklessness, and violation of her state and federal rights. Compl., ECF No. 1-1, ¶¶ 3–7,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.