Legal Opinion

Amorosa v. Ovelman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1926No. Appeal 139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This is an action for recovery of a commission by a real estate broker. The statement of claim sets forth an oral agreement to pay a commission of $100 for the services of the plaintiff in obtaining a purchaser for a piece of property which the defendants proposed to sell. The affidavit of defense denied the oral agreement but set forth a written agreement, entered into by the plaintiff, as their agent, with the purchaser, according to the terms of which the plaintiff was to receive a commission of $100 “at settlement.” No settlement was accomplished. The defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simon v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Kaiser v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Matolicz v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cirotti v. WassellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Matuszewski v. GrisiusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API