Matolicz v. Hess
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This judgment, entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, cannot be sustained. A real estate broker sued for commissions alleged to have been earned pursuant to a contract to obtain a purchaser ready and willing to purchase real estate of defendant. The affidavit of defense avers that the commission was to be payable only “if a sale was effected” “upon terms satisfactory to” defendant. He admits an averment in the statement to the effect that he executed an agreement of sale to a proposed vendee (procured by plaintiff) for $14,000, of which $2500 was to be paid…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Simon v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Keel v. SchadewaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matuszewski v. GrisiusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Amorosa v. OvelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926