Legal Opinion

State v. Smathers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1922No. 17115PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C. J.

The defendants, Ben Smathers, Russell Smathers and Frank Wilcott, were, by information filed in the superior court for Snohomish county, jointly charged with the offense of maintaining in that county a place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. They were tried together in that court, sitting with a jury, and all were found guilty. Judgments of conviction were rendered accordingly against each of them, from which each has appealed to this court.

*473The only contention here made in behalf of appellants is that the trial court erred to their prejudice in admitting in evidence against them,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. RoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. GunkelWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. City of Tacoma v. HoustonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City of Olympia v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. NilnchWashington Supreme Court · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API