Legal Opinion

– Williams v. Geico General Ins. Co. –

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 2020No. 117149Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,149 ROYCE WILLIAMS, Appellee, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Personal injury protection "substitution benefits" as defined by K.S.A. 40-3103(w) are allowances for appropriate and reasonable expenses incurred in obtaining other ordinary and necessary services in lieu of those that, but for the injury, an injured person would have performed for the benefit of such person or such person's family. They are subject to a maximum of $25 per day for not longer than 365 days after the date such expenses are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of CallisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. In Re Estate of AntonopoulosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. ZCD Transportation, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Hephner v. Traders InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API