Legal Opinion

Naftal v. Jarvis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action was brought to recover on two alleged causes of action, both based on promissory notes whereon defendant was an indorser.

Upon the trial plaintiff obtained a verdict in his favor in the sum of $7,520.06 upon the first cause of action, but his second cause of action for $5,000 was dismissed by the trial court for failure of proof. In accordance with this result judgment was entered on June 24, 1922, by plaintiff’s attorney. On June 26, 1922, a copy of said judgment, with notice of entry thereof, was served by plaintiff’s attorney on defendant’s attorneys. On July 25,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New Rochelle Gas & Fuel Co. v. Van BenschotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Corporation of Frederick Scholes v. Theodore Ficke Warehouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. People ex rel. Textile Realty Corp. v. ChambersNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People ex rel. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co. v. LillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. In re the Arbitration between Stern Bros. & LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API