Legal Opinion

McCREARY TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY v. Crawford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1960No. 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Intervenor has one assignment of error: The court erred in signing the judgment, and in not allowing intervenor’s motion to recall the executions.

The exception to the signing of the judgment presents two questions: One, do the facts found support the judgment, and two, does any error of law appear upon the face of the record. Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486, and cases there cited.

Plaintiffs in their written and verified answer to intervenor’s written motion aver that the Trust Receipts executed and delivered by Crawford to intervenor were in effect chattel mortgages. Judge…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hauselt v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Butts v. . ScrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Frank v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Morrow v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Wayne Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. In Re the Custody of OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Frazier v. O. S. Stapley Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API