Ritterbusch v. Ritterbusch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The sole question here is: Does the complaint state a cause of action against the defendants? At the demurrer stage, the facts alleged in the complaint are to be assumed to be true. The fact that the plaintiff may have difficulty in proving such facts cannot be considered. Only the legal premises are contested. “. . . A complaint, when attacked by demurrer, should be liberally construed, and sustained if it expressly, or by reasonable inference, states any cause of action. ...”
Here the defendants, by demurring, raised and rely upon the statute of frauds (sec. 240.08, Stats.) as a defense.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Volk v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Purtell v. TehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bembinster v. Aero Auto Parts, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Christenson & Arndt, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weiss v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Keller Ex Rel. Monson v. Welles Department Store of RacineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Ardisam, Inc. v. Spreetail, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Randall v. GeoffreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973