Legal Opinion

Asmussen v. Young

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2019No. 28875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶1.] David Asmussen has filed a motion for a certificate of probable cause to appeal the denial of habeas corpus relief from his kidnapping convictions. Because his habeas claims are clearly procedurally defaulted, we deny the motion.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] At the conclusion of a jury trial in Codington County in late 2006, Asmussen was convicted of two counts of first-degree kidnapping in connection with the 2001 disappearance of his girlfriend in Watertown. Asmussen waived counsel and exercised his right of self-representation during trial following an advisement by the trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Shawn Owens v. William E. Boyd, Warden, Western Illinois Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Dansby v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Holmes v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Asmussen v. YoungDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API