Legal Opinion
State v. Wacker
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1959No. 1144PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
Ray Waclcer was informed against by the county attorney of Pinal County, Arizona, for wilfully failing to comply with the provisions of Amended Crop Regulation No. 7 of the Arizona Commission of Agriculture and Horticulture, a regulation designed to suppress and eradicate an insect pest known as the Pink Bollworm of Cotton. The defendant was specifically charged with failing after harvest to have crop remnants remaining in his cotton field shredded, chopped or cut and plowed under to the depth of four inches or more, a misdemeanor. On motion to quash the information, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Wallace v. FeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Carstens v. DeSellemWashington Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
- American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Arizona Commission of Agriculture & Horticulture v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Security Insurance Company of New Haven v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.