Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Town of Slidell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 18, 1915No. 21424PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany; Joseph B. Lancaster, Judge. Action by B. P. Dunham and another against the Town of Slidell and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

[1] On motion to dismiss appeal. This motion is based on the insufficiency of the certificate of the clerk of court attached to the transcript of appeal, in which he certifies that it contains “a true and complete copy of the entire record on file and of record in the clerk’s office of said court,” etc., in the above-entitled case.

This certificate was subsequently supplemented by an affidavit of the clerk in which he states that the “transcript of appeal contains and is a true copy of all the proceedings had and papers filed in the case.”

The error complained of is not one which is to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunham v. Town of SlidellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Rubber Co. v. Town of Breaux BridgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API